![boom cannon boom beach boom cannon boom beach](https://media.sketchfab.com/models/18139ea007ad47e0a7595d488682f2de/fallbacks/e8c2e71efce04d3bb2f52e2a1168cc1f/6f55b7e1e83d49a68f912feb3ff43894.jpeg)
It drove commuters outside the Bay Area for affordable housing to places such as Santa Cruz. Seven years ago, in spite of the massive amounts of new housing produced for the booming tech economy in the San Francisco Bay Area, the insatiable demand was pricing residents out of their homes and neighborhoods. Yet their message is more complex than that. 14, “…prompted by a recent threat of lawsuit from YIMBYLaw….” (Ibid.) The pro-development advocates who call themselves YIMBY (Yes In My Back Yard), have been notable at city meetings, and the Sentinel opinion page, showing their compassion for those in need of housing. The project will be reviewed again at 4 p.m. The 831 Responsible Development citizens group supports new housing in Santa Cruz, but don’t regard the development project at 831 Water Street to be either responsible or respectful to those who want it to reflect local character.
![boom cannon boom beach boom cannon boom beach](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DhZ5dY1X0AA9fe7.jpg)
![boom cannon boom beach boom cannon boom beach](https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/boombeach/images/0/0d/Boom_Cannon16new.png)
The building’s institutional look has been described as prison-like, but seems immune from local standards of beauty. (Contributed - Novin Development via City of Santa Cruz website file ) It is being proposed for the Hilltop Shopping Center site on historic Bolcoff Hill. Modern image of the five-story 831 Water St.
BOOM CANNON BOOM BEACH PLUS
12, for not meeting local requirements for affordable units to be integrated within the structure instead of segregated, that special permission is needed to build within 20-feet of a 30% slope plus plans for stormwater management, traffic, and noise studies. The proposed apartments at 831 Water Street seem to be a test case, initially denied by the Santa Cruz City Council in a 6-1 vote on Oct. Senate Bill 35 takes authority over Santa Cruz development away from City Government and California Environmental Quality Act review, giving it instead to private developers.